Your AI product team

One PM. The power of an entire product team.

Turn scattered customer evidence into a product decision your team can trust. Give every team the decision, the context, and the reasoning behind it.

Book a demo See how it works

Argus

✓Sources 12
Proposal
Review
Decision
Publish

⌁Working through this decision privately

You10:42

Should we introduce role templates for enterprise workspaces?

ArgusGrounded in 12 sources

Yes, for new enterprise workspaces.

✓

The strongest pattern is setup friction. It appears in 37 support tickets and five admin interviews.

S4R2

There is one trade-off to resolve. Admins want safer defaults. Team leads want faster invitations.

S7C2

Start with Admin, Team lead, and Member. Keep existing workspace permissions unchanged.

Open questionWho can edit a role after workspace creation?

Ask Argus about this decision

Connect the systems where your product work already lives.

Customer feedbackResearchCRMDocumentsDeliveryAnalytics

One connected decision

From scattered evidence to work your team can act on.

Follow one initiative from the first source to a reviewed decision and a clear delivery handoff.

Gather

Bring the evidence into one private initiative.

Select the sources that matter. Their origin, freshness, and boundaries stay visible.

Argus · Private workspaceSources

You10:31

Bring the evidence about enterprise access into this initiative.

ArgusSearching connected systems

I found four useful sources.

Their origin and freshness will stay attached as we work through the decision.

✓4 sources added to this private initiative

Sharpen

See what the evidence supports and where it disagrees.

Facts, judgment, conflicts, and unknowns are separated before the proposal takes shape.

Argus · Evidence analysis12 sources

You10:35

What does the evidence support, and where does it disagree?

ArgusCompared across 12 sources

Supported

Default roles reduce repeated access setup. Seen across support, research, and onboarding notes.

S4 · S8 · S11

Conflict

Speed and control point to different defaults. This needs an explicit trade-off.

S7 · S9

Unknown

Who owns role changes after launch? No source defines the operating owner.

Needs owner

Propose

Shape a proposal that is ready to challenge.

Recommendation, alternatives, boundaries, risks, and success criteria stay together.

Argus · Working proposalPrivate

You10:38

Turn this into a proposal I can review.

ArgusPrepared from the evidence

I shaped the recommendation and added a clear rollout boundary.

I also made the migration boundary an explicit non-goal so it survives review and delivery.

+Proposal update ready to review

Decide

Give the right person the decision, not a document dump.

The proposed change, its evidence, and the important trade-offs lead the review.

Review · Version 3Awaiting approval

Decision requested

Approve role templates for new enterprise workspaces

Approver: Maya Chen · VP Product

Proposed change to product behavior

New enterprise workspaces begin with Admin, Team lead, and Member role templates.

8 supported claims1 open conflict2 comments resolved

⌁

Approval creates an Argus decision. It does not publish to an external system.

Carry into delivery

Preview exactly what engineering receives.

Argus drafts the downstream work. You edit it and confirm before anything leaves Argus.

Delivery previewApproved decision v3

Project

Enterprise workspace role templates

4 issues

Create default enterprise role templates

Includes acceptance criteria and approved non-goals

Draft

Add guided permission review

Preserves the unresolved ownership question

Draft

Instrument workspace invitation completion

Matches the approved success criteria

Draft

One decision, useful across the company

The decision keeps working.

Change the audience and see the relevant context. The approved decision itself never changes.

Decision

New enterprise workspaces begin with Admin, Team lead, and Member role templates. Admins review permissions before inviting the wider team.

Customer value

Enterprise admins can set a safe starting point without building every permission from scratch.

Supported by support pattern S4 and CRM opportunity C2

Rollout boundary

Role templates apply to new enterprise workspaces first. Existing workspace permissions do not change.

Approved non-goal · Decision v3

Acceptance criteria

Admins can review all default permissions before inviting members.
Every role change is visible before workspace creation.
Existing workspaces remain unchanged.

Open question

Who can edit a role after workspace creation, and which changes require admin review?

Owner needed before delivery starts

CRM signal$48k ARR opportunity

Expansion depends on clearer enterprise access controls.

Source · CRM opportunity C2

Qualification boundaryNew workspaces first

Do not position this as a migration for existing permission models.

Source · Approved non-goal

Support pattern37 related tickets

Most requests ask how to choose safe permissions during setup.

Source · Support pattern S4

Known limitationNo existing-workspace migration

Current permission models stay unchanged in this release.

Source · Approved rollout boundary

Build contractThree acceptance criteria

Permission review, visible changes, and no impact to existing workspaces.

Source · Approved decision v3

Needs resolutionRole editing ownership

Engineering needs an owner before defining post-creation permissions.

Source · Open question Q2

Why Argus

Each decision gives the next one a better starting point.

Argus keeps the evidence, trade-offs, approval, and handoff together. The next PM, engineer, or customer-facing team does not have to reconstruct the story from scattered tools.

General AIStarts from the next prompt.

Feedback toolsStop after synthesis.

ArgusCarries the decision and its why forward.

Jun 04

Approved decisionEnterprise onboarding model

7 sources · Approved by Maya Chen

Published

Jul 18

Approved decisionAdmin audit history

11 sources · Approved by Ravi Shah

In delivery

Aug 16

Approved decisionEnterprise workspace permissions

9 sources · Approved by Maya Chen

Ready to publish

Shared product recordWhat changed, who approved it, and why

Trust and control

Move quickly without losing the decision.

Private work stays flexible. Shared truth and external actions have clear boundaries.

Evidence remains inspectable.

Claims keep their sources, freshness, and conflicts close.

Private work stays private.

Explore freely before asking the wider team to review a change.

Important changes require review.

The right person approves what becomes shared product truth.

External actions stay separate.

Preview and confirm what leaves Argus before anything is published.

A focused pilot

Bring one important initiative.

Start where the decision matters, the evidence is scattered, and another person needs to trust the outcome.

Book a demo

A strong starting point has:

01An autonomous PM who owns the decision
02Evidence spread across the systems involved
03One designated non-owner approver
04A real delivery workflow after approval

Pilot scope is agreed around your initiative, review flow, and connected systems.

FAQ

A few useful answers.

What Argus does, where it fits, and how a pilot starts.

What is Argus?

Argus is an AI product team that helps a PM turn scattered evidence into a reviewed product decision and carry the approved result into delivery without losing the reasoning.

How is Argus different from a PRD generator or feedback tool?

PRD generators start with a prompt, and feedback tools often stop at synthesis. Argus keeps the evidence attached as the work moves through proposal, review, approval, and handoff.

Does Argus replace our existing product stack?

No. Argus connects the systems where product work already lives and adds a decision layer above them.

What systems can Argus connect to?

We scope connections around the initiative and the systems involved. We confirm the exact sources and delivery workflow with you before a pilot begins.

What happens during a pilot?

We start with one initiative, bring in the relevant evidence, shape the proposal with the PM, involve one approver, and define what should move into delivery.

How does review and approval work?

The PM develops the proposal privately, then submits a fixed version for review. Approval creates an Argus decision and never publishes to another system automatically.

Does Argus take actions on its own?

Argus can prepare downstream work, but external actions are shown for review and confirmed separately.

Book a demo

Start with one decision that matters.

Tell us what you are working through. We will start with the evidence, the people who need to weigh in, and where the work needs to go next.

Prefer email? hello@heyargus.app